I have seen advertisements—private and public—declaring things like employees come before clients; and inclusion and equity are of utmost importance—or legally necessary; and social justice or equality are integral—when we have never been more equal: in liberty and in wealth. It is arguable that we are quite equal—through market forces and free interchange—unless we don’t want to be—so that we can be.
Someone is specifically hijacking principles form liberty and individual rights and business (free trade; voluntary association)—negative rights and business—and rearranging them—I think from the time we are children—to re-code the whole world. It is allegedly for principles of good. But I think it is for some other reason.
Someone is hijacking the organic interconnectedness of humans and humanity. Liberty and individual rights have proven to allow incredible freedom and wealth distribution and goodness and philanthropy the likes of which has bever been seen before in our history. But someone somewhere wants to organize us into some type of collective—I think for their own benefit; not yours; or “ours.” And even if you believed in these things and not a profiteering agenda, if you look, the organic interchange of good and services and the evolution of human goodness in a free society is astronomical. In a collective—or a hive—it is terrible. And highly disastrous. Except for the vanguard.
Someone is going to great lengths to hack the way you think and act—for alleged general welfare. Which has never been even close to this good via any centralized mind or authority. It is even arguable that it is perfect—except for those who don’t want it to be.
Education is crucial to any individual or society. If you teach your children well, your society ends up well. Whoever is endeavoring this is going straight to the children also—trying to indoctrinate them—not educate them. The children are not being taught blind empathy and compassion—they are being taught justice—according to a set of categories. Not general morality or skills—but a set of programs that are not equal—but are specifically geared toward certain groups of people. They may be the majority. So, we may have a hijacking tyranny of the majority. The founding fathers of America, at least, thought of this ahead of time. And it is interesting how the constitution is being hacked—and overridden—and adjusted—meticulously. And I noticed that the French declaration of rights of human and citizen was hacked form its inception: with positive rights—allegedly for the collective. But I don’t think so.
Every time there is a centralized authority of some kind; anytime there is a centralized mind or alleged group mind, it ends very badly. Look at Soviet Russia or Maoist China for example. And probably Europe at this point. And now America. They ended up totally destitute. And living in a police state. And when there is liberty and prosperity from liberty, the collective, if you want to call it that, we evolve tremendously in terms of empathy and goodness and goodwill and philanthropy. Really people around the world are not very nice. Where there is liberty, they really are.
So when you allow these revolutionaries to decide your representatives or codes of conduct or business practices or social practices, why are you doing it? Is it by choice? Or for a bribe? Or out of extortion? Or fear? Or force. When, if you were a successful business, you already treated everyone equally and well. If you didn’t, you were run out of business. Or you really believe these common good propaganda. There is no doubt in your mind. You have indoctrinated--just like in Orwell's 1984.
I notice that the federal credit unions now have a deal with Ncontracts—an entity specifically designed to profit off of human sacrifice and tapping a great source. So I notice we are going down. Together.
No comments:
Post a Comment