Do you exist? The social perspective versus the whole or autonomous or actualized person.

Do you exist?  The social perspective versus the whole or autonomous or actualized person.

 

 

Do you exist without your relation to other people?  If you do, you have good relations and relationships and financial success and inner and outer peace.  If you don’t, you are poor in spirit and materially and in relations.  And you are prone to violence and microviolence.

 

If you are always focusing on other people, you will never be happy and usually not achieve or achieve less.  If you exist without your relationship to other people, you will have good relations and form loving communities.  If you are always focusing on the social and other people, you will have communities of enmity or cancellation or violence.

 

Social develops naturally.  Where it is forced, you have anti-social psychology and behavior.  You have violence and meta violence.

 

And a whole person is much more at peace.  And peaceful.  And empathetic and kind and giving and philanthropic.

 

If you want to rule, you will always be a slave.  If you don’t want to rule, you will always be a king.

 

And this is the human perspective.  There are those who will con you with social community or justice or alleged good intentions-- so that they can steal everything from you—and rule you.  And centralized authority ALWAYS devolves into this.

 

If you have been raised with values or morals or mores you of course can freely associate or form communes or communities or even nations (if you are homogenous) where you have similar mores and some type of community.  Ideally.